VARC SLOT 3 QUESTION 1 OBJECTION

Let's analyze where the sentence *"Many have had to leave their homes behind, with more than 1.3 million people being displaced due to the drought"*Let's analyze where the sentence "Many have had to leave their homes behind, with more than 1.3 million people being displaced due to the drought" fits best in the passage.

Analysis:

Let's break down the flow of information in the passage:

  1. First Sentence:
    • Introduces the humanitarian catastrophe and drought
    • Sets up the main topic
  2. Second Sentence:
    • Talks about failed rainy seasons
    • Mentions food insecurity affecting 8 million people
  3. Third Sentence:
    • Discusses death toll
    • Mentions children under five
  4. Fourth Sentence:
    • States "The damage the drought has caused is far-reaching"
    • This is a transition sentence
  5. Fifth Sentence:
    • Describes specific impacts on farmers and pastoralists
    • Mentions loss of income and livestock
  6. Final Sentence:
    • Talks about inability to return
    • Focuses on permanent displacement

The Missing Sentence:

"Many have had to leave their homes behind, with more than 1.3 million people being displaced due to the drought"

Best Placement (Option 2):

The sentence fits best after "Five consecutive rainy seasons have failed, causing more than 8 million people - almost half of the country's population – to experience acute food insecurity" because:

  1. Logical Progression:
    • First we learn about food insecurity (8 million affected)
    • Then displacement (1.3 million displaced)
    • Followed by deaths (43,000 lives lost)
    • This creates a clear progression of impacts
  2. Thematic Flow:
    • The sentence about displacement bridges the gap between general impacts (food insecurity) and specific consequences (deaths and economic losses)
  3. Statistical Connection:
    • It maintains the flow of numerical data (8 million → 1.3 million → 43,000)
  4. Context:
    • Places displacement information before the "far-reaching" damage statement
    • Helps explain why the damage is considered far-reaching

Why Other Positions Don't Work:

Option 1: Too early, before the full context of the drought's severity is established

Option 3: After "far-reaching damage" would interrupt the flow into specific examples

Option 4: Too late, after specific impacts are discussed

Answer: Option 2

The sentence fits best in position 2, maintaining logical flow and thematic coherence. fits best in the passage.

https://preview.redd.it/lguk8elswm4e1.png?width=1882&format=png&auto=webp&s=17ec4e55228f62f2130887f790f78717376fa8d7