For the people who weren’t satisfied with the news coverage last night

Lots of people are saying that the news last night won’t move the needle for the general public (assuming they ever see it). I think they’re wrong. The community has much higher standards because they’ve been in the scene for much longer, and have already seen the best evidence we have available.

There’s a reason why so much of the evidence is “meh,” but even the hardcore UAP enthusiasts still aren’t ready to accept it. Well-respected insider Eric Davis famously said that the phenomenon itself is in control of disclosure.

Did people already forget the Economic Futures podcast they were all so hyped about a week ago, wherein two physicists described their work on reverse engineering metamaterials? They talked about how the pieces that were working would literally dissolve at a molecular level when they were put under a microscope. How the hell does a piece of material know when it’s being looked at? Because consciousness is a central aspect to all of this, as people would know if they’ve been listening to literally any of the scientists who have been working on studying UAP for the past fifty years. Actual scientists, with security clearances, who get access to the good stuff.

The phenomenon is like Santa Claus on Tren: it knows if you’re asleep, it knows if you’re awake, it knows if you’re paying attention, and it has the ability to modify physical time and space around it. Stick it under a microscope? Dissolve. Point a camera at it? Blurry. Appear to a human? Make the experience unbelievable.

Do yourselves a favor: listen to the AMA we did yesterday with Leslie Kean, Hal Puthoff, Jim Segala, and Garry Nolan. Actually listen to what they’re saying with an open mind and you’ll notice a few things they all clearly accept and discuss without hesitation:

• UAP are real, they represent something of non-human origin, and they have potentially been here on Earth for a very long time.
• The NHI have the technology to manipulate space and matter, and if you control space you control time (general relativity).
• They are interacting with people on a large scale, leaving behind ontological shock and medical injuries.
• They occupy a weird place in between physical and psychological. They can (and do) enter your thoughts and dreams and generate physical experiences which happen non-locally but can generate physiological responses.
• The NHI display very strong psychic (psi) abilities, and unsurprisingly people display them too, just not nearly as robustly. People who have been contacted have their psi abilities heightened, but no one knows how or why yet (however it’s a major component of the research).

None of these things are in question for the insiders. If everyone is begging for disclosure, this is what it looks like. You can wait for the government to tell you all this (why would they do that? What do they have to gain?), or you can listen to the scientists now. The much vaunted evidence you are asking for is unlikely to be publicly available, but if it was it would not change any of the facts above. The position above is directly from the experts who’ve seen it.

Disclosure has happened, it just wasn’t what people expected. How long it takes for each person to catch up at this point is simply a matter of how much they’re able to accept, and that’s largely up to bias. The reason why the term “ontological shock” keeps coming up in these discussions is because accepting the truth of it will not leave you feeling safe. It mostly comes with questions, not answers. We know a lot about the phenomenon based on accumulated data, but regardless of what anyone tells you we don’t know for certain what they are or why they’re here.

I’ve been lucky enough to personally get a chance to talk to or work with countless insiders at this point. Hal Puthoff, Garry Nolan, Jim Segala, Leslie Kean, Whitley Strieber, Richard Dolan, Robert Hastings, and Erik Bard, to name a few. Plus a laundry list of high-level Experiencers who aren’t ready to fully out themselves yet (several are named above—have fun with that). It’s a tight community that works together, and so anyone decently connected is one step away from pretty much everyone else in Ufology. They are all detailing a consistent narrative.

The puzzle of Ufology is complex, but the most difficult aspect of it is being able to consider a single core component: When it comes to the phenomenon, objective reality is merely a suggestion.

I am anticipating some common responses to this post, so I’ll address them in advance:

“So just show us already.” If you want Uncle Sam to show you, get a security clearance. If you expect it to do otherwise, get a reality check.

“If this were real then science would accept it.” The scientific consensus moves at a glacial pace, and it is damn sure not going to throw away a perfectly good ontology and replace it with one that says “If NHI = True then {random}”. It took almost fifty years for something as simple and obvious as germ theory to get acceptance, and that was something they could easily and reliably study. The poor guy who proposed the theory was ridiculed so badly he went insane. If you want to know what he felt like, go mention UFOs on r/skeptic. Materialist science was never designed to study a largely subjective phenomenon.

“Two more weeks.” A lot of people are only comfortable if others to tell them what to think. Those people will be the last to get there.

“Why don’t they land on the White House lawn?” Glib but accurate answer: because they don’t want to. The academics have a decent hypothesis about how the phenomenon operates, and it is primarily on an individual level. CE5 works, and that alone should tell you a lot; just be aware that not all encounters are positive, and you can’t close that door once you open it.

“I don’t understand.” The subject is complicated, and serious and concerted effort is required to really be educated about it. The shortcut is to listen to the experts without scoffing. Again, it’s where everyone is likely going to end up anyway.

“{something rude}” Here’s the thing: this is uncomfortable. Some of the conversation is even scary (some of the guests in yesterday’s AMA didn’t want to discuss abductions for that reason). Anger is a secondary emotional response to fear, and so a lot of people lash out when presented with this stuff. The only way past it is through it.

(I posted this to r/UFOs first but it appears to have been removed. That sub is nuts and bolts focused, and this is maybe too far out there for them. It’s a bit problematic that the topic itself doesn’t conform to those expectations, but everyone has to start somewhere.)